Could someone’s Love-Thinking-Intuition undergo fission, splitting into two sets of intuition-desires that administer pollutants to one another?

Poisoning and intuition-desires are both neutral terms, both embodying imaginative capacity and creative capacity.

The Intuitive-Pollutant is not poisoned wine or poison, nor is it venom, and certainly not a toxin; rather, it is an ordinary and ever-abundant thinking-medium.

No language, happens to be in a state of Isolated-Existence.

Virginal-White in the evening breeze—will it be slowly lingered-over by linguistic intuition, rife with growing-suspicions, amidst Sunset-Glow & Wondering-Cloud of Chastity-Intuition?

Someone’s Intuition-Beehive is steadfastly mended and patched up day by day.

Someone might also lock away their steadfast self within a Intuition-Honeycomb.

Steadiness is the double-edged white sword of linguistic intuition: white coming and going, white intense and white faint, white rising and white falling—yet one pristine white after another has never stemmed from any intuition.

The visual-sense brings lifelike-desires, whilst also carrying away edgy-love-thinking and edgy-dream-thinking.

Love-Letter-Intuition is all about adventuring to the edge.

An Intuitive Love-Letter, on the other hand, is a Sheer-Edger through and through.

Don’t cry, and don’t laugh! Who isn’t a Carving-Intuition-Set?

Is someone’s Intuition-Desire at this very moment Carving-Intuition amidst the bustling crowd, vying with each other?

Innocent-Virtue-Desire is the Innocent Starting-Point-Set.

Pure-Piety-Desire is the pury Landing-Point-Set.

Why do these two sentences look and sound so much like a Sheer Ill-Formed-Sentence?

Grace-Desire is by no means love-thinking.

Thinking-Fission may be an intuitive-transmutation in which linguistic intuition takes Grace-Desire as both its starting point and its landing point; it may also be…

So, what, then, is Grace-Acme?

Innocent-Virtue refers to innocent nobility, which is also innocent-grace, graceful-virtue or graceful- innocence.

Pury-Piety refers to pure sincerity, which is also known as pure-grace, graceful-piety, or graceful-purity.

These are the exemplary models of the two sets.

In short, if grace is a straight line, then Innocent-Virtue and Pure-Piety are the two endpoints of that line; if Gender-Intuition were, in an instant, an incomparably smooth and infinitely extending plane, whilst Language-Intuition were the Habitual-Power driving that Straight-Line to spin ceaselessly upon that Plane, then—the Complete Circle and Perfect Ring, industriously traced by that straight line and those two endpoints, are like Set-Love, which exists tranquillly at all times…

Set-Time and Set-Meal both exist, whereas Set-Love has never existed and never will.

Love-Thinking-Line is Set-Love-Thinking.

Straight-Love-Thinking is Love-Thinking-Meal.

Why is there a steady stream of pollutants at a person’s Love-Thinking-Endpoints?

Based on the Language-Screen and Gender-Intuition—one is prone to judging the whole from a part; furthermore, based on the former, chasing-acme makes it easy to be confined to fixed starting points & landing points; further, based on the first two, Intuition-Completeness and Intuition-Perfection are sufficient to effortlessly supplant Intuition-Whole; continuing from the first three, Seeking-Completeness and Seeking-Perfection constitute Chasing-Intuition-Part; Finally, building upon the preceding four, Set-Part, Set-Language, Set-Gender and Set-Love are unified into one; this is both Foregone-Love-Thinking—and Love-Thinking-Finality.

Between the Language-Screen and the Sheer-Curtain, the love-thinking=calamity is both boundless and soundless.

Is Farce-Desire the same as Grace-Desire?

Innocence is distinct from Purity.

Virtue is also distinct from Piety.

The above represent the four Chase-Angles of Gender-Intuition and Language-Intuition; they are also the four Grace-Angles and the four Persona-Angles.

Chaste-Desire resembles Chaste-Love-Thinking, yet it is not; rather, it is a desire of chastity.

Benevolence-Desire and Mean-Desire are two perspectives of Grace-Desire; the former is a desire of goodwill, whilst the latter is a desire of astutity.

Do the above constitute the three sets of Limerence-Desire?

What is Love in one set is Desire in another; similarly, what is Virtue or Piety in one set is Non-existence in another; and, as with the first two, what is Completeness or Perfection for one set is Calamity for another; Just as with the three aforementioned sets, the two sets of intuition- desire within a single individual both chase Grace, both imitate Acme, both pursue the Part, both adorn the Screen, and both propel Limerence…

Love-Thinking-Calamity is Language-Intuition-Calamity.

Without language, there is no love-thinking.

Without love-thinking, there is no Love-Thinking-Intuition.

Without Love-Thinking-Intuition, there may still be Language-Intuition.

There is inevitably a Desire-Tension, an Angle-Conflict and an Intuition-Contradiction between Language-Intuition and Love-Thinking-Intuition; A person must either grasp sheer-intuition—which is by no means aesthetically pleasing—or, amidst the love-thinking-paradox, consign love to oblivion, bear time in mind and become enamoured with the language-part, or else be completely carried away by language…

A person’s love-thinking — both benefits from and is ensnared by language.

Lively love-thinking is nothing other than a lively Intuition-Confrontation.

At this point, it must be emphasised time and again: desire is a neutral term.

At the same time, is Love-Fame a Set Valid-Formula for Grace-Desire that serves this exquisite desire?

Furthermore, does exquisite love-thinking—appear as if by magic, together with marvellous linguistic intuition and gender intuition?

Someone approaches such a chaotic Love-Thinking-Language for the very first time.

Intuition-Chaos—where should one even begin? The image below depicts an Intuition-Fissure: